An invitation for 1 (no plus 1) to a “bus crash” of a review
- By Brian Leveson
- •
- 10 Oct, 2021
- •
550 children (approx.) get assistance from Haringey special educational needs transport service ‘SEN Transport’ and after a ‘car crash’ of a start to the new school term 1 parent (and only one parent) has been invited to contribute to the learning review of the service failure
You may be aware from our last SEND Newsletter published here that there will will be leading an informal learning review to explore the key events that led to significant numbers of children with SEND not being provided with transport to their place of learning at the start of term. Please find attached the scope for the review which provides more detail of how this review will operate.
I would like to invite one of you to contribute to this review on behalf of the Parent Carer Forum. The review will identify key learning and influence our planning and delivery model, moving forward. To support the review, I have attached a template that I have asked stakeholders to complete regarding their view about what happened, which can be from their own perspective or representing a wider view. This will then inform key lines of enquiry which will be discussed with us as a stakeholder group at a meeting on Tuesday 16th November from 1:30 – 4:30pm. Following this, I will pull together a report which will identify learning and recommendations for implementation to improve practice and make sure we do not have a situation like this again.
If one of you would like to become a part of the review, can you please let me know so I can extend an invitation to you. Can you also please complete this template.
I know that there may be more than one you who would like to be part of the learning review. However, I want to keep the size of the group small so we can be focused on developing our plan swiftly, and you will be able to represent wider views.
I do hope that one of you will be able to support this work. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you would like to discuss things further.
It's quite simple...
No consideration whatsoever was given to families in this service redesign and its implementation
Template questions from the service
We say ...
