A closer look at Haringey SEND departments claims of engagement reveal that the same old problems still prevail

  • By Brian Leveson
  • 26 Feb, 2021

A closer look at Haringey SEND departments claims of engagement with parents show the same old problems still prevail.  Engagement is not inclusive and limited to only face to face meetings, with no alternative for excluded communities; engagement still  seems to lack good governance, transparency, clear lines of reporting and good project management like timelines, milestones and deadlines.

Councillors asked the SEND department for flexible and imaginative ways of engaging parents and carers

Scrutiny Panel Report 2020 said that


"Much is demanded of parents and carers. There is a considerable burden of paperwork that is placed on them and they are increasingly having to battle to obtain the support that their children need. There is a welcome aspiration to engage and involve them in planning and developing services. However, the demands of looking after children with SEND are considerable which can make it very difficult for many to be actively involved. Flexible and imaginative ways of engaging parents and carers therefore need to be found. Co-production with parents and carers and a collaborative approach should now be being followed in the design, planning and development and of services. There needs to be a shared understanding of what this means in practice and for it to be fully embedded. We would expect that the response to our recommendations to follow such principles to share these principles." 

Engagement is not inclusive: it is very limited and inflexible; it is not transparent and there is no evidence of good governance, reporting structures, clear timelines etc

Engagement is still restricted to a selected few, does not allow enough time and opportunity for engagement and seems to have no transparency

In order to participate in 'coproduction' parents have to give up their limited time (in the middle of a global pandemic, whilst caring 24/7 and home schooling and working) to attend 'online' meetings. This would seem to exclude people who are not digitally connected and those with the most complex and arduous caring responsibilities. As councillors have said, more flexible way of engagement are needed. The Haringey Consultation Charter promises that "We will use appropriate consultation methods". Limiting engagement to only online meetings in the middle of a pandemic is not appropriate and excludes those in digital poverty and families who have the most complex caring responsibilities.

The recent Whittington Health engagement was a GOOD example of the flexibility we would like to see.  The engagement included letters directly to users, TWO online surveys and a range of online meetings - the details for which were openly advertised online.  Following discussions, they project team have been open to extending the consultation end date.  Kudos to them!

See here the Whittington engagement pages. Link:Haringey Engagement - Our Buildings (whittington.nhs.uk)

 When we requested to join the SEND meetings on the Parent Carer forum, no details were forthcoming from the commissioner. 

There is no good governance and transparency about what was discussed at both of these events for example no publicly published agendas and minutes. The principles of good governance and transparency must be adhered to, in order to ensure that promised actions are carried out. Poor governance and reporting structures have been an on-going issue with Haringey SEND engagement, so many hours of the outcomes of engagement have been wasted. Haringey's own Consultation Charter promises that At the end of the consultation we will communicate what will happen next, when the results of the consultation will be published, when and by whom the decision(s) on the proposal(s)will be taken, and when the decision(s) will be published 

The engagement is still being run by the officers of the council, not parents.
And it is the officers who arrange the meetings, plan the agendas and chair the meetings. Parents are still not being treated as equal partners.

The Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Code of Practice (January 2015) paragraph 4.7 requires the 'Local Offer' of SEND services to be:
• collaborative: local authorities must involve parents, children and young people in developing and reviewing the Local Offer. They must also co-operate with those providing services (4.9  Local authorities should do this in a way which ensures that children, young people and parents feel they have participated fully in the process and have a sense of coownership)
accessible: the published Local Offer should be easy to understand, factual and jargon free. It should be structured in a way that relates to young people’s and parents’ needs (for example by broad age group or type of special educational provision). It should be well signposted and well publicised
comprehensive: parents and young people should know what support is expected to be available across education, health and social care from age 0 to 25 and how to access it. The Local Offer must include eligibility criteria for services where relevant and make it clear where to go for information, advice and support, as well as how to make complaints about provision or appeal against decisions
up to date: when parents and young people access the Local Offer it is important that the information is up to date
transparent: the Local Offer should be clear about how decisions are made and who is accountable and responsible for them

(Link to SEND CoP (Jan 2015): https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/3988...)


There are questions to be asked about the SENDIASS recommissioing

Was the SENDIASS engagement rushed over a period of less that 2 weeks to be completed 2 days before a decision critical of the Haringey SEND department and the Haringey SENDIASS service offered by Haringey was published?Was the SENDIASS engagement rushed over a period of less that 2 weeks to be completed 2 days before a decision critical of the Haringey SEND department and the Haringey SENDIASS service offered by Haringey was published?

There are questions about the SENDIASS consultation. I have some concerns about the SENDIASS consultation that seemed to have been run before  the announcement of a Local Government Ombudsman decision that was critical of the service.

Because we do not know, because we did not attend the meeting and because there are no published minutes, we do not know if the 26 parents who attended were aware of that decision - and therefore had the opportunity to consider all the facts about the current SENDIASS service provision.

Read more on the blog: Were Haringey parents misled in the Special Educational Needs and Disability Information Advice and Support Service (SENDIASS) recommissioning "consultation"? (difficultparent.com)

Two examples of engagement by Haringey SEND with poor governance - and the outcomes - Changing Places and Haslemere respite centre

  1. An example of the outcomes that poor governance leads to is the ongoing campaign for Changing Places in order for people with complex toileting needs and their families to access leisure activities in Haringey, which we first raised to the then Head of SEND in 2016, when we were asked to review the global leisure offer to Haringey families, and again in 2019. Link: Haringey has asked us: If you had 15K, which public building in Haringey would you spend it on, and what would you do to it to make the building more accessible for your child? (difficultparent.com) 
  2. Another example is the 'engagement' and a lack of upward reporting, transparency and good governance the Haringey respite centre, Haslemere respite. Link: Whatever happened to Haslemere? (difficultparent.com)

From the SEN (D?) newsletter about their 2 most recent engagement activities

SENDIASS Recommissioning

The Council is continuing to co-produce services with parent/carers and all parent/carers were invited to attend one of three engagement events in January to discuss re-commissioning the SENDIASS in Haringey and to gather their views and comments. 26 parents attended in total and they shared their views and experiences which was helpful and informative and have been used to shape the new service specification.

Following the events eight parent/carers volunteered to be on the working group to co-design the service specification and 4 parents have volunteered to be part of the evaluation panel. The tender process will take place over the next few months and parents/carers will be updated on the outcome.

The Council would like to thank the parent/carers who volunteered to be involved in co-producing these services and it has been a great opportunity for the council and parent/carers to work together to improve services for children and young people with SEND and their families.

Parent Carer Forum

Following the engagement events held in November, parent/carers volunteered to work with commissioners to co-design the service specification to commission a host provider to work with parents/carers to establish a new parent carer forum in Haringey. The contract opportunity will be advertised over the next couple of months and parents will be part of the evaluation process. We will let you know when a host provider is chosen and how you can get involved.

Haringey Consultation Charter

Haringey Council defines consultation as a process of dialogue that helps lead to a decision. We will undertake consultation so that people who live and work in the borough have a say in the Council decision making process and know that their views have been taken into account. Haringey Council is committed to making sure all its consultations are effective and efficient. This charter has been drawn up so that you know what you can expect from consultations.
  1. Consultation is a fundamental part of the planning and provision of services. 
  2. We will value the time and energy that people put into responding to consultations and will make it simple for people to tell us what they think. 
  3. Whenever possible we will co-ordinate our consultation programme with other organisations that consult people living and working in Haringey. 
  4. Understanding what we already know is better than asking again – we will monitor our consultations and avoid duplication and repetition. 
  5. We will communicate clearly about the purpose of the consultation, who is being consulted, the way we are consulting and when decisions will be taken on proposals. 
  6. We will actively seek to engage communities affected by the proposal(s) and explain how the proposed changes might affect different people. 
  7. We will provide enough information about consultation to help people make an informed contribution. We will include information about other issues and facts being considered by decision-makers alongside the consultation results. 
  8. We will use Plain English and translate documents into other languages, transcribe into other formats (e.g. Braille) and provide interpreters at meetings when they are needed. 
  9. We will use appropriate consultation methods. 
  10. We will follow good practice and legal requirements that relate to equality and social inclusion. 
  11. At the end of the consultation we will communicate what will happen next, when the results of the consultation will be published, when and by whom the decision(s) on the proposal(s)will be taken, and when the decision(s) will be published
By Brian Leveson March 25, 2025
If you thought SEND was bad - the NHS is seemingly prepared to throw away money to private companies
By Brian Leveson September 28, 2023
About 3 or 4 times a year we get the euphemistic message 'Parents please note we have put a letter in your child's bag' - its a world away from how a child's death was handled in my child's first school
By Brian Leveson September 27, 2023
More of a trial by ordeal than a well organised clearly set out administrative process for moving the care of vulnerable young adults from Haringey's Children's Services to Adult Services. We have been failed at every stage of the process.
By Brian Leveson September 24, 2023
Never EVER get on the bus without a camera running if you need the priority wheelchair space
By Brian Leveson September 17, 2023
The reality of using a London Bus in the teeming rain on a Sunday afternoon is no joke when the parents of a paraplegic person in a wheelchair clash with the self-entitled buggy-pushing parents of toddlers.
By Brian Leveson September 13, 2023
At 3pm today I received some barefaced lies from Haringey Council Adult Social Care in response to a photograph I published online yesterday and the media interest it generated
By Brian Leveson June 22, 2023
Haringey SEND Transport are insisting that a 17 year old minibus with no air conditioning is a suitable vehicle to transport my paraplegic son in this heatwave. The appalling conditions inside the minibus inside the bus is something they knew about last summer, yet they have to date done nothing whatsoever provide a suitable minibus this year nor appropriately mitigate the temperatures inside the minibus.The conditions inside the minibus are so bad that they triggered multiple seizures during the heatwave as my son has epilepsy, which they SEND transport department know about and they also know that they are triggered by heat.It is not just son who is impacted: last year we know of one child who died on Haringey SEND Transport in the summer heatwave and another who had seizures.
By Brian Leveson January 3, 2023
I am simply asking a question - are we all absolutely certain that the road closure / travel restrictions (commonly know as LTNs) placed on some of the most severely disabled people who are wholly reliant on cars are absolutely necessary
By Brian Leveson January 2, 2023
Haringey's road closures exemptions policy for disabled people is not fit for purpose, unduly burdensome and intrusive - it's time to stand up against the pro-LTN lycra-clad cycling bullies
By Brian Leveson January 1, 2023
Is the argument for and against exemptions for disabled people in Low Traffic Neighbourhoods really a case of GOOD versus EVIL?
More Posts