Where the *UCK did our park go?
- By Brian Leveson
- •
- 27 Jun, 2021
- •
Last Thursday (24th June) the green bit of play space on Elizabeth Place, off Lawrence Rd, Tottenham, Haringey was boarded up without notice, without planning permission, without consultation, without any warning whatsoever - is planning a meaningless "tick box" process? ***NEW (29/06/21) Updated with Section 106 decision & council meeting minutes Planning Subcommittee Thursday 3rd November 2016 - is it still our park - owned BY THE PEOPLE OF HARINGEY?????*** And if not who was given the power to sell it? THIS HAS NOW BEEN SORTED BY PERAY AHMET
Where the *uck did it go?
[The] council & developer made a "private" arrangement to do something completely different [than what was put in the planning application].
How much is the lease fee?
But I also question how much fun playing next to a building site with all the dust and rubble and noise will be. i also wonder how much dust this will generate - and if the builders have to wear masks then so should any children playing in the play space.
The tree I looked in lockdown year - but could not go near
We have been very strictly shielding for a year and have been aware that people with learning disabilities have been SIX times more likely to die of COVID that the rest of the population. We have been fighting for our child's right for equality for over a decade, so when the pandemic started we were already acutely aware that the rationing of scarce resources was very unlikely to extend to us - and we were unfortunately so very very right in that prediction.
Green spaces, parking allocations and gym use - all out of bounds for the poor.
We have been allocated and pay for a disabled parking bay - one of only 2 spaces in a development with far more than 2 disabled people - and through what seems to be a act of 'double accounting' despite paying for the space, we do not have exclusive access to it, as there are no other disabled spaces for the development.
As more housing is thrown upwards on our road, we expect this situation with parking for people with disabilities, who CANNOT use public transport, to worsen.
We are used to the contempt from the officers of Haringey Council
This park was taken from us with no notices put up, no consultation and outside of the normal planning processes.
It's no change the operations of the local authority - no coproduction, no irritation parents of disabled children askig for play space.
CANCELLED Protest Planned at the site, 6pm Friday 2nd July 2021
Me and the cat and the wheelchair bound son WERE planning a little protest at the site: Elizabeth Place 'used to be a' play area UNTIL THE LEADER OF THE COUNCIL STEPPED IN AND SORTED IT
How to view this planning application "HGY/2020/2843"
2. Search this reference: HGY/2020/2843
3. Click on the reference number for further information and detailed plans
What we found - the plans do not include taking the play ground, not even in the construction phase.
Condition 22 - Construction management plan
Condition 22 - Construction management plan - Appendix D - Demolition Phase
In order to have confidence in local government, people have to believe what officers of the local authority say - here the planning process seems to have been a meaningless "tick box" exercise
What's this all about? If you view the above planning application you will see it is linked to another ref HGY/2016/1213 - which has an S106 Decision attached
What is an S106 Decision?
As part of the planning process a local planning authority and a developer may enter into a legal agreement to enable any adverse impacts of a development to be offset, to enhance the physical environment or to contribute to local facilities where this is not possible through planning conditions.
This agreement, known as a Section 106 agreement (the legislative basis for planning obligations is Section 106 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990) is a delivery mechanism for the matters that are necessary to make a development acceptable in planning terms
Looking at the S106 Decision for Elizabeth Place
HGY/2016/1213. (link:http://www.planningservices.haringey.gov.uk/portal/servlets/ApplicationSearchServlet?PKID=289524)
You need to look at the document S106 Decision (1).pdfExcerpts from the S106 Decision for Elizabeth Place
Will we ever get the park back in my lifetime? The developer is responsible for the maintenance of Elizabeth Place Park for the lifetime of the development
... and the Elizabeth Place Park Footpath
Council meeting minutes Planning Subcommittee Thursday 3rd November 2016
Council meeting minutes Planning Subcommittee Thursday 3rd November 2016 - says NOTHING about taking the park
Representatives for the applicant addressed the Committee and raised the following points:
· The schemes would provide new housing including a 19% affordable housing contribution across the two sites as well as in demand family housing.
· Car parking provision would solely be for disabled access thereby allowing increased landscaping and tree planting, with a net increase of 12 trees across the sites.
· New commercial floorspace would be generated which would be retained and managed by the developer, with part used as a headquarters.
· Improvements would be made to Elizabeth Place Park and the open ground to the north at the lead of a steering group. (Nothing about taking it)
· The QRP was in support of the schemes.
· Internal balconies were proposed to reduce overlooking.
· The footprint of the woodland area would be retained as an open landscaped area with significant trees retained and secured under condition.
Where is this 'steering group' from the planning sub-committee? Who are they? Where do they meet? Where are the meeting minutes?
There are currently 10 members of this private Facebook group, set up by the developer: Is this the Steering Group (set up June 1st 2021)?
Was the park sold by an unelected official?
RESOLVED
· That planning applications HGY/2016/1212 and HGY/2016/1213 be approved and that the Head of Development Management be authorised to issue the planning permission and impose conditions and informatives subject to the signing of a section 106 Legal Agreement providing for the obligation set out in the Heads of Terms.
· That the section 106 Legal Agreement referred to above be completed no later than 31/11/2016 or within such extended time as the Head of Development Management or the Assistant Director Planning shall in her/his sole discretion allow; and
· That following completion of the agreement(s) referred to above within the time period provided for above, planning permission be granted in accordance with the Planning Application subject to the attachment of the conditions
· That delegated authority be granted to the Assistant Director to make any alterations, additions or deletions to the recommended heads of terms and/or recommended conditions as set out in the officer report and to further delegate this power provided this authority shall be exercised in consultation with the Chairman (or in their absence the Vice-Chairman) of the Sub-Committee.
