AMAZE report recommendations for Haringey professionals

  • By Brian Leveson
  • 30 Mar, 2021

After a few meetings about engagement, we thought it worth reminding professionals about what the AMAZE Report recommended about sending information out a week in advance; sending dates out 3 weeks in advance; sending consultation information out 6 weeks in advance and agreeing dates with parents in advance.

Recommendations

For the recommendations, 'professionals' has been used as shorthand to cover staff working in commissioning and leadership roles at the local authority and health, as well as those working in education, health and care. Leadership across these sectors will need to identify and take ownership of specific recommendations relating to their teams and d rive forward their implementation, as the change required can only be achieved by a proactive, cohesive approach in the borough.

 CULTURE AND PRACTICE

Senior management at the council to lead on fostering a collaborative culture of honesty and transparency by being in the first tranche of staff to be trained on participation and ensuring partnership working is embedded across teams and processes. Contact, SCI E and N EF consulting offer training of this nature.

Co-produce a training programme about participation with parents for delivery to all client-facing staff and include participation techniques, customer service,  as well as training on the parent carer journey. This should be co-delivered with parent carers and include them sharing their stories face-to-face with staff and also via bite-size video clips. This should be mandatory for all new staff as part of their induction and offered over a defined period to all existing staff.

Ensure sufficient time/capacity is built into staff work plans and project plans to support a variety of participation activities. This should include time for senior management to meet with the PCF and hear from parent support groups. Delivery of this activity must be reviewed as part of an individual's annual appraisal.

Have standard agenda items at all key decision making meetings, such as: Update from the PCF I What needs to be shored with the community and What do we need to co-produce going forwards, for example

Local authority and CCG to provide a joint grant (ideally for 3 years initially) to both the the new PCF and their support organisation which sets out clear expectations and KPls for engagement activity

 

STRUCTURE AND PROCESSES

Review the existing SEND Executive Board and consider whether this is the correct route for a SEND partnership, or if a new group is needed. This will require the involvement of all stakeholders and representation from the local authority, CCG, voluntary organisations such as SENDIAS and spaces for two parent reps from the parent carer forum.

The SEND Executive/new Partnership Board should be allocated responsibility for governance and commissioning for SEND services and given decision-making powers, feeding up into other appropriate governance structures, i.e. the Health and Wellbeing Board, Start Well Board, or Borough Partnership meetings. The Chair of the new PCF should also be invited to sit on the Start Well Board.

Other subgroups, or shorter task and finish groups, should report into the SEND Executive/new Partnership Board structure for example the High Needs Block sub-group, the Transport Review.

Once established, the PCF Chair should be offered the opportunity to co-chair this board, which should have clear Terms of Reference. It would also be very useful to have a diagram of what meetings are going to happen going forwards and reporting lines between each. We understand this is being worked on currently.

So that this board is developed with input from SEND families we would suggest that it should be paused until the forum's interim steering group has been appointed (see back office support recommendations).

In the meantime, there will need to be a temporary channel through which parents can raise concerns. We would suggest that the local authority and CCG set up an email address so that parents have a point of contact and views can be collated. Urgent queries and issues can be forwarded to the necessary teams while topics and concerns that need further consultation with the community can be collated for presentation at the SEND Executive/new Partnership Board. Although this is not ideal, it is essential in order to put the right foundations in place.

Meeting dates to be agreed in advance and PCF reps involved in agenda setting.

Minutes, agenda items and other relevant documents should be shared at least one week prior to the meeting, to allow parent carers time to prepare.

Standing agenda item at meetings to include update from PCF on priorities in the SEND community

 PARTICIPATION PROJECTS AND COMMUNICAITON

Professionals to plan ahead for consultations and engagement opportunities, with an ideal minimum of three weeks' notice for meetings and six for consultations.

Parents should be involved from the outset to help determine what type of engagement activity would be most effective. As part of this planning, have discussions around the needs of families who do not have English as a first language and whether translated materials or interpreters to access the opportunities can be provided.

Utilise social media, websites, text and WhatsApp to communicate upcoming sought and used in performance reviews. engagement opportunities, plus emails and flyers via schools and Markfield. Once established, partner with the PCF to promote events and other opportunities to participate. Provide flexible participation methods, such as face to face meetings, focus groups, online participation via Zoom, surveys, meetings at existing support groups and voluntary organisations, and via email.

Agree the scope of pieces of work by developing a co-production document and a brief to bring clarity to the process and manage expectations.

Ensure there is timely follow up to pieces of engagement work and consultations, starting with an email to thank participants. If there are many things to resolve, split them and communicate what has happened with easily resolved points, by using a 'you said ... we did' format. Let families know that other more complex and work towards parent representation at meetings. issues are being looked at and further communication will follow. Give regular updates via social media, the newsletter and so on, so parents know that their input has been valued and contributed to change.

Council to consider developing a comprehensive disability register, possibly with a partner organisation so that detailed data can be gathered to help plan services for families.

Consider joining up a leisure discount card to the register scheme to offer an incentive for families to share their personal data. Co-produce the project to develop the scheme so that families can say how much data they would be prepared to share and service commissioners and managers can consider what data they would find most helpful. Look at outsourcing the scheme to an independent organisation, as families might be more willing to share their data.

Use register to identify translation needs and most vulnerable families in the borough and plan for targeted services to meet these needs, including some of the initiatives mentioned earlier.

SERVICES AND STAFFING

Training, for all staff who are in client-facing roles to ensure courtesy, prompt responses and excellent communication with families.

Management to develop evaluation processes and protocols to ensure there is consistency in the quality of services provided, and feedback from families is regularly sought and used in performance reviews.

Give staff the appropriate tools and support to ensure they have the confidence and skills to de-escalate situations and successfully resolve issues for parents.

Training for teams to encourage open two-way dialogue and transparency when dealing with parent carers and ensure staff value the knowledge of parent carer

Ensure prompt assessments from social care and that families are signposted to the children's disability team to access support. Work to improve shared understanding and transparency around eligibility thresholds for families.

Provide information which helps parents to understand the EHC panel process and work towards parent representation at meetings.

Collectively review intelligence from a variety of sources such as the PCF, SENDIASS, Disability Register, service evaluations and service feedback to help determine priorities together.

Make increasing co-production a standard objective in personal development plans for services for families.

By Brian Leveson 28 Sep, 2023
About 3 or 4 times a year we get the euphemistic message 'Parents please note we have put a letter in your child's bag' - its a world away from how a child's death was handled in my child's first school
By Brian Leveson 27 Sep, 2023
More of a trial by ordeal than a well organised clearly set out administrative process for moving the care of vulnerable young adults from Haringey's Children's Services to Adult Services. We have been failed at every stage of the process.
By Brian Leveson 24 Sep, 2023
Never EVER get on the bus without a camera running if you need the priority wheelchair space
By Brian Leveson 17 Sep, 2023
The reality of using a London Bus in the teeming rain on a Sunday afternoon is no joke when the parents of a paraplegic person in a wheelchair clash with the self-entitled buggy-pushing parents of toddlers.
By Brian Leveson 13 Sep, 2023
At 3pm today I received some barefaced lies from Haringey Council Adult Social Care in response to a photograph I published online yesterday and the media interest it generated
By Brian Leveson 22 Jun, 2023
Haringey SEND Transport are insisting that a 17 year old minibus with no air conditioning is a suitable vehicle to transport my paraplegic son in this heatwave. The appalling conditions inside the minibus inside the bus is something they knew about last summer, yet they have to date done nothing whatsoever provide a suitable minibus this year nor appropriately mitigate the temperatures inside the minibus.The conditions inside the minibus are so bad that they triggered multiple seizures during the heatwave as my son has epilepsy, which they SEND transport department know about and they also know that they are triggered by heat.It is not just son who is impacted: last year we know of one child who died on Haringey SEND Transport in the summer heatwave and another who had seizures.
By Brian Leveson 03 Jan, 2023
I am simply asking a question - are we all absolutely certain that the road closure / travel restrictions (commonly know as LTNs) placed on some of the most severely disabled people who are wholly reliant on cars are absolutely necessary
By Brian Leveson 02 Jan, 2023
Haringey's road closures exemptions policy for disabled people is not fit for purpose, unduly burdensome and intrusive - it's time to stand up against the pro-LTN lycra-clad cycling bullies
By Brian Leveson 01 Jan, 2023
Is the argument for and against exemptions for disabled people in Low Traffic Neighbourhoods really a case of GOOD versus EVIL?
By Brian Leveson 31 Dec, 2022
Letters from Labour Grandees and survey results from Haringey Council show people who opposed LTNs are women, elderly and disabled. Yet Peray Ahmet has described anti-LTN people as homophobic, islamophobic, sexist, racist and xenophobic.
More Posts
Share by: